Alaska
Non Physician Abortion Providers Performed One-Third of US Abortions in 2025, Report Shows
In 2025, more than 360,000 abortions — about a third of all U.S. abortions last year — were provided by advanced practice clinicians rather than physicians, according to new data released by the Guttmacher Institute, a think tank that researches…
Last updated:
Key points
- Advanced practice clinicians performed over 360,000 abortions in 2025, accounting for roughly one-third of all clinical abortions in the United States.
- Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia currently allow non-physician healthcare providers to perform medication or first-trimester aspiration abortions.
- State courts remain divided on scope-of-practice laws, with some states expanding provider access while others enforce physician-only requirements.
What did the Guttmacher Institute abortion report reveal about national trends?
NewsWK — A new Guttmacher Institute abortion report shows that non physician abortion providers administered more than 360,000 abortions in 2025. That figure represents roughly one-third of all clinical abortions conducted nationwide last year. The total includes both medication prescriptions and surgical aspiration procedures performed outside of traditional physician care.
The statistical jump highlights a major shift in how health care facilities operate across the United States. Today, many clinics rely heavily on non-physician staff to manage daily patient loads. Meanwhile, state lawmakers continue to debate whether medical scope-of-practice rules should require a licensed doctor for these procedures. The Guttmacher study excluded self-managed abortions performed outside formal health systems.
According to the research organization, expanding provider qualifications helps clinics address ongoing staff shortages in reproductive health. Study lead Isaac Maddow-Zimet emphasized the expanding scope of these medical roles in a written statement.
“These data help to illustrate the critical role that [advanced-practice clinicians] play in providing abortions across the country, including in many underserved communities,” Maddow-Zimet stated.
How are states regulating nurse practitioner abortion access across the country?
Currently, twenty-five states and the District of Columbia permit nurse practitioner abortion access and other non-physician care. However, state laws vary significantly regarding which specific procedures clinicians may perform. Most authorizing states limit non-physicians to medication prescriptions or first-trimester aspiration procedures.
The list of jurisdictions allowing these providers currently includes:
- West Coast and Pacific: California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii
- Mountain West and Southwest: Colorado, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Arizona
- Midwest: Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, and Ohio
- East Coast: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia
In addition, political shifts following recent midterm elections could lead to expanded authority in states like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Meanwhile, proponents of scope expansion argue that physician requirements create unnecessary barriers for patients seeking care.
Operational guidelines from professional associations also influence state debates. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports expanding clinical authority. In an official issue brief, the organization argued that restricting care exclusively to physicians “are not based in science; improperly regulate medical practice; and impede patients’ access to quality, evidence-based health care.”
Which medical qualifications define advanced practice clinicians abortion services?
State regulations specifically dictate which healthcare workers can offer advanced practice clinicians abortion services. These clinical designations typically include nurse practitioners, physician associates, advanced practice registered nurses, and certified nurse-midwives. Each role requires graduate-level education, but training requirements differ from full medical degree programs completed by licensed physicians.
Furthermore, medical licensing boards maintain distinct oversight rules for each credential. While medical doctors undergo years of surgical residency training, advanced practice clinicians complete clinical hours focused on specialized nursing practice. Consequently, state legislatures frequently reexamine these distinctions when establishing professional boundaries.
What does the shift toward non-physician care mean for state regulators and patient safety?
The rising reliance on non-physician clinicians directly impacts state medical boards, rural clinics, and patient care standards. For local communities, expanding provider qualifications can increase appointment availability at regional clinics. However, critics and some state judges argue that physician supervision remains essential for patient safety during medical procedures.
For example, state oversight bodies must balance health care access against rigorous professional standards.
Additionally, the shift changes operational costs for health systems in states that authorize broader scope-of-practice rules.
Why do legal standards for abortion care providers US remain divided in state courts?
State judicial systems across the nation currently hold contrasting views on legal requirements for abortion care providers US. Federal regulatory changes began accelerating this division in 2016. At that time, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration altered guidelines for mifepristone, allowing non-physicians to prescribe the abortion medication nationwide.
Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, state courts have moved in opposite directions. Courts in Alaska, Michigan, North Carolina, and Ohio recently struck down long-standing physician-only mandates. Similarly, medical professionals in Arizona are currently challenging state restrictions under a recently passed constitutional amendment.
Conversely, other state courts continue to enforce physician requirements. Earlier this year, a Missouri judge upheld the state’s physician-only law even after striking down other regulations. The judge specifically cited the extensive differences in clinical training between medical doctors and mid-level practitioners. Consequently, legal boundaries for non physician abortion providers remain fractured across state lines.
This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by our editorial team.
Sources
Related: Congress Receives New Legislation Aimed at Local Health Care Protection
Related: 4 years after Dobbs, advocates clash over how far to take fight for later abortion access
See a typo? Report it here.
