California
Local Efforts to Tackle Housing Shortages by Reevaluating Parking Requirements
In 1923, the city of Columbus, Ohio, enacted the first known off-street parking requirement for new apartment buildings. The city’s rules got stricter over time. In 1954, a Columbus apartment building with 100 one-bedroom units had to have at least…
Key points
- Cities and states are reducing parking minimums to address housing shortages.
- California has enacted a statewide ban on parking minimums near transit stations.
- Local leaders express concerns about state overreach in zoning regulations.
NewsWK — In the face of persistent housing shortages, numerous cities and states across the U.S. are moving to reduce or eliminate minimum parking requirements for new developments. This shift aims to lower construction costs, making housing more affordable for residents.
Historically, cities like Columbus, Ohio, implemented strict parking regulations, mandating extensive parking spaces for residential and commercial buildings. For example, a Columbus apartment complex was once required to provide one parking space per unit, which has since increased significantly. However, as housing crises worsen, these minimum requirements are increasingly viewed as barriers to new construction.
According to the Parking Reform Network, a collective advocating for changes in parking policies, over 14 states have passed laws to relax parking mandates since 2019. Major cities including Baltimore and San Francisco have completely abolished parking minimums in their jurisdictions.
Catie Gould, a senior researcher at the Sightline Institute, noted that the movement to repeal parking mandates has gained traction as affordable housing becomes a central issue. “I don’t think parking reform would be happening if we weren’t having a housing crisis,” Gould stated. She emphasized that many existing parking requirements lack rational justification.
While proponents argue that reducing parking minimums can free up funds for better housing amenities, some residents express concerns about potential increases in street congestion and the impact on vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and disabled, who may rely on accessible parking.
California has taken a leading role in this movement, with Governor Gavin Newsom signing a law that bans parking minimums near transit stations, effective since January 2023. Similar initiatives are underway in states like Oregon, Connecticut, and Virginia, which are also focusing on developments near mass transit hubs to alleviate housing shortages.
Local leaders, however, are pushing back against state legislation that they feel undermines local zoning authority. Betsy Gara, the executive director of the Connecticut Council of Small Towns, argued that municipalities should have the discretion to determine the appropriateness of parking requirements based on local needs and safety considerations.
As more states reconsider parking regulations, the balance between local control and the urgent need for affordable housing continues to be a hot topic among policymakers and residents alike.
Based on reporting by Robbie Sequeira originally published by Stateline. Read the original story.
