National News
Bipartisan Lawmakers Introduce Workers Right to Compete Act to Limit Noncompetes
Content Files PDF XML TEXT Metadata download Descriptive Metadata (MODS) Preservation Metadata (PREMIS) All Content and Metadata files, including granules ZIP
Key points
- H.R. 10879, the Workers’ Right to Compete Act, would ban non-compete agreements for employees making under $100,000 annually.
- Jointly introduced by Representatives Ro Khanna and Anna Paulina Luna, the bipartisan bill eliminates future and pre-existing non-competes within 30 days of passage.
- The legislation was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce following its introduction on October 22, 2026.
What does the Workers Right to Compete Act mean for wage earners?
NewsWK — The HR 10879 noncompete bill protects wage earners nationwide by barring private companies from enforcing restrictive employment agreements. Under this proposed federal law, businesses cannot impose non-compete clauses on individual workers earning less than $100,000 annually. Furthermore, the broad statutory policy applies to both future employment contracts and pre-existing agreements. This rule takes effect within 30 days of the legislation’s official passage into law.
Who introduced the Ro Khanna noncompete bill in Congress?
Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA-17) and Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) jointly introduced H.R. 10879 on October 22, 2026. They sponsored the bipartisan proposal during the 119th United States Congress legislative session. Official legislative records state the title prohibits noncompete agreements for workers earning below specified income thresholds. Consequently, the bill unites bipartisan co-sponsors in a shared national effort.
How does the Anna Paulina Luna noncompete bill advance in the House? Workers Right to Compete Act
On October 22, 2026, congressional officers referred the noncompete ban under 100k directly to committee. Specifically, the bill went to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce for formal review. Additionally, lawmakers published an official Constitutional Authority Statement in the Congressional Record, Volume 172, Issue 163. Therefore, House committee members now oversee the statutory review process for this proposed bipartisan reform bill.
This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by our editorial team.
Sources
Related: House Resolution 1499 Clears Way for Critical Votes on Mining, Higher Education, and Maritime Rules
Related: Study Examines Women on Parole Mental Health and Reentry Crises Across the US
See a typo? Report it here.
