H. Res. 1575 Donald Trump Impeachment Measure Filed in House by Rep. Steve Cohen

Last updated: October 28, 2026

NewsWK — Representative Steve Cohen introduced a comprehensive resolution in Congress to remove President Donald Trump from office. The Tennessee Democrat filed the measure on September 24, 2026. House leaders referred the legislative package to the House Committee on the Judiciary that same day. However, the resolution arrived without any initial co-sponsors.

What is the Steve Cohen Trump impeachment resolution introduced in the House?

Representative Steve Cohen introduced House Resolution 1575 on September 24, 2026, seeking to impeach President Donald Trump. The measure contains 26 separate articles of impeachment. Specifically, it accuses the president of constitutional violations and abuses of power. However, Cohen filed the measure without co-sponsors, and it immediately moved to the House Judiciary Committee.

The filing marks another formal attempt by House Democrats to challenge executive authority. House members hold the sole power to initiate impeachment proceedings under Article I of the Constitution. Therefore, individual lawmakers frequently use resolutions to register formal opposition to presidential policies.

Meanwhile, congressional records show that Cohen filed the document during the second session of the 119th Congress. The official filing carries the designation H. Res. 1575. Because no other lawmakers signed on as co-sponsors, the resolution reflects a single member’s initiative at introduction.

What charges are included in the 26 articles of impeachment Donald Trump faces in the filing?

The resolution outlines a wide range of broad allegations spanning foreign affairs, executive orders, and federal spending. Rep. Cohen alleges that executive decisions on military actions, border enforcement, and grant allocations exceed constitutional limits.

The document spans twenty-six individual counts targeting executive branch operations and administrative actions. For example, several counts address executive orders involving immigration policies and federal workforce standards. Other counts focus on executive oversight of federal funding and interagency operations.

The broad scope of the resolution covers multiple policy areas:

• Foreign Policy and Military Action: Allegations regarding military operations in international waters without prior congressional approval.
• Executive Authority: Claims concerning executive orders on birthright citizenship and federal personnel policies.
• Fiscal Controls: Allegations regarding the withholding or redirection of congressionally appropriated funds.
• Government Oversight: Claims regarding the management of federal grants and state funding streams.

What specific allegations outline the Donald Trump impeachment articles? H. Res. 1575 Donald Trump Impeachment

The filing details charges including foreign military operations, executive policy changes, and federal employment policies. Specifically, Rep. Cohen’s measure cites executive orders on birthright citizenship, military actions in international waters, and spending withholdings. Each charge claims a breach of presidential authority under Article II of the United States Constitution.

In addition, the filing alleges misuse of presidential pardon powers and violations of constitutional emoluments provisions. Rep. Cohen argues that executive actions regarding international military operations bypassed statutory oversight. However, legal scholars frequently debate the boundaries of presidential commander-in-chief powers under federal law.

Furthermore, the resolution criticizes administration efforts to implement workforce loyalty evaluations across federal agencies. The measure also claims that administration officials improperly withheld federal funding from select state programs.

What does the House resolution 1575 mean for American voters and taxpayers?

For American taxpayers and voters, congressional impeachment filings consume substantial legislative time and committee resources. Political resolutions allow members of Congress to signal positions to their supporters. However, unsponsored measures rarely reach the House floor for a full vote or formal committee hearings.

Congressional committee reviews require administrative staff time, legal analysis, and record processing. Consequently, taxpayers carry the operational cost of managing legislative filings in Washington. Moreover, many legal experts note that resolutions without broad party backing face significant procedural hurdles.

Meanwhile, voters across the country face pressing economic and national security issues. When lawmakers focus on symbolic resolutions, critics argue that routine governance takes a back seat. Therefore, business owners and working families closely watch whether Congress prioritizes budget legislation over political disputes.

What is the background and legislative path for H. Res. 1575 Donald Trump impeachment efforts?

Under United States House rules, leaders refer impeachment resolutions directly to the House Judiciary Committee upon introduction. Without broad support from leadership or party colleagues, individual resolutions frequently remain stalled in committee. In fact, historical precedence shows that un-sponsored impeachment filings rarely advance past initial referral.

The House Committee on the Judiciary holds jurisdiction over impeachment resolutions under standing congressional rules. Once committee leaders receive a resolution, they decide whether to hold hearings or draft formal reports. Because the committee maintains a crowded legislative calendar, many referred measures receive no formal consideration.

Also, the political alignment of the House heavily influences the path of any impeachment resolution. A resolution requires majority support in the House to pass articles of impeachment to the Senate. Currently, H. Res. 1575 remains pending before the House Judiciary Committee with no hearings scheduled.

Related: House Resolution Introduced Seeking Impeachment of Donald Trump

Related: House Resolution 1499 Clears Way for Critical Votes on Mining, Higher Education, and Maritime Rules